Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels does not improve performance of difficult visual discriminations.
<p><b>A)</b> Example of grating stimuli separated by 15° for difficult task (top), schematic of optogenetic manipulations activating only PV cells expressing ChR2 (middle), optogenetic stimulation timings for all four conditions aligned to stimulus onset (STIM ON) or offset (STIM O...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Lilia Kukovska (22683586) (author) |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | Katharina A. Wilmes (22683589) (author), Natsumi Y. Homma (22683592) (author), Claudia Clopath (324706) (author), Jasper Poort (22683595) (author) |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels during entire stimulus presentation or late phase V1 activity impairs discrimination performance, whereas stimulating during early phase V1 activity improves performance.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
PV cell activation alone does not induce changes in behavioral redouts during the stimulation period (0–2 s).
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
Changes in neural selectivity caused by PV cell activation reflect behavioral performance in easy but not difficult discriminations.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
(related to Fig 3) Behavioral parameters in the difficult discrimination task.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025) -
(related to Fig 3) Testing a difficult discrimination task.
by: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Published: (2025)