DL-Predicted severity scores versus consensus radiologists’ severity scores.

Similar Items

• Examples of CXR severity score evaluations by two radiologists.
  by: Nastaran Enshaei (9405653)
  Published: (2025)
• The distribution of severity scores in our COVID-19 CXRs based on the average evaluations of four radiologists.
  by: Nastaran Enshaei (9405653)
  Published: (2025)
• The performance of individual radiologists, their consensus, and the DL model in the first diagnostic scenario (excluding COVID-19 CXRs with a severity score of zero as assessed by at least three radiologists).
  by: Nastaran Enshaei (9405653)
  Published: (2025)
• COVID-19 sensitivity (%) of the proposed DL diagnostic model compared to four individual radiologists and their consensus, stratified by severity level. Severity was categorized based on radiographic severity scores: low (≤ 8), medium (8–16), and severe (> 16). Sensitivity is reported as mean ± standard deviation across eight randomized test splits.
  by: Nastaran Enshaei (9405653)
  Published: (2025)
• Evaluation of the severity scoring model’s robustness to inter-observer variability. The model was trained using the average scores from four radiologists. During testing, one radiologist was excluded at a time, and performance was compared against the remaining consensus. Results include overall Pearson correlation and MAE, along with subgroup MAEs across three severity levels: Group 1 (SI ≤ 8), Group 2 (9 ≤ SI < 16), and Group 3 (SI ≥ 16). Pearson Co.: Pearson correlation. MAE: mean absolute error. SI: Severity score Index.
  by: Nastaran Enshaei (9405653)
  Published: (2025)