Comparison of contingent versus in situ evolution of antennae under 2.5m depth of water.

A.) Average initial absorption spectrum for in situ evolution (solid lines), as a function of cost, compared to the initial spectrum of the unevolved population (dashed line). B.) Averaged final absorption spectra for the contingent (solid lines) populations as a function...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Callum Gray (2691769) (author)
Other Authors:	Samir Chitnavis (20861997) (author), Tamara Buja (20862000) (author), Christopher D P Duffy (20862003) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Evolutionary Biology Ecology Inorganic Chemistry Infectious Diseases Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Astronomical and Space Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified work better around physical principles underlie photochemical reaction centre linear absorption profile complex biosphere rich common basic architecture basic biological processes latter would seem generalized thermodynamic model div >< p various light environments representative light environments general evolutionary model distinct antenna structures harvesting using thermodynamics light environments would exist harvesting structures evolutionary algorithm antenna systems antenna </ photosynthetic light wide range structural topology spectral profiles reproduce qualitatively pigment composition perform photosynthesis multiple types might evolve like exoplanets different intensities biomass production
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Comparison of contingent versus <i>in situ</i> evolution of antennae under 2.5m depth of water.

Similar Items