Skip to content
VuFind
  • Login
    • English
    • اللغة العربية
Advanced
  • Sample plot of the confidence...
  • Cite this
  • Text this
  • Email this
  • Print
  • Export Record
    • Export to RefWorks
    • Export to EndNoteWeb
    • Export to EndNote
  • Save to List
  • Permanent link
Sample plot of the confidence curve.

Sample plot of the confidence curve.

<p>The confidence curve peaks at each event and features a standard deviation of 53.3 ms.</p>

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xiaowen Chen (192197) (author)
Other Authors: Anne E. Martin (10838318) (author)
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Science Policy
Space Science
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Information Systems not elsewhere classified
use roughly 8
use neural networks
two lstm models
recent methods tend
previous lstm algorithms
machine learning algorithms
ground reaction force
custom ankle exoskeletons
algorithm successfully detected
manually identified events
events within 16ms
subjects &# 8217
heel marker height
detection methods tend
assistive walking device
testing data ratio
low training requirements
new model required
detecting gait events
final model output
new long short
term memory model
assisted walking using
new model
gait events
term memory
long short
subjects walking
model makes
weighted output
heel strike
detection rate
walking behaviors
unassisted walking
kinematic data
79 training
utilize thresholding
significantly altered
paper introduces
high robustness
excellent tool
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
  • Holdings
  • Description
  • Comments
  • Similar Items
  • Staff View

Similar Items

  • Matrix of comparison of the proposed method with other methods. The new method shows significantly lower ME, MAE, and STD, and the highest SR and DR among all methods shown in this table. Moreover, the percentage of extra events detected from the new method is particularly low.
    by: Xiaowen Chen (192197)
    Published: (2025)
  • Comparison between individual and final models. The GRF and heel model are the models trained using only the ipsilateral GRF signal and only the ipsilateral heel height signal, respectively. The heel marker model performs significantly worse than the other two models. The GRF and final models had similar error metrics.
    by: Xiaowen Chen (192197)
    Published: (2025)
  • Neural network error metrics for training and testing data sets. The neural network performs similarly between training and testing trial sets and performs slightly better for training subjects compared to testing subjects.
    by: Xiaowen Chen (192197)
    Published: (2025)
  • Summary metrics for differences between LSTM and manual events for all trials from all subjects. All error metrics were extremely small for both HS and TO. However, the TO detection was more precise but less accurate than HS detection.
    by: Xiaowen Chen (192197)
    Published: (2025)
  • Difference between LSTM and manual (a) heel strikes and (b) toe offs for all trials.
    by: Xiaowen Chen (192197)
    Published: (2025)

Find More

  • Browse the Catalog
  • Browse Alphabetically
  • Explore Channels
  • Course Reserves
  • New Items
Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ffruer1vlegp3m7eebqanr4g6q