Skip to content
VuFind
  • Login
    • English
    • اللغة العربية
Advanced
  • Comparison of different method...
  • Cite this
  • Text this
  • Email this
  • Print
  • Export Record
    • Export to RefWorks
    • Export to EndNoteWeb
    • Export to EndNote
  • Save to List
  • Permanent link
Comparison of different methods for PCB defect detection.

Comparison of different methods for PCB defect detection.

<p>Comparison of different methods for PCB defect detection.</p>

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Asim Niaz (17655568) (author)
Other Authors: Muhammad Umraiz (10176287) (author), Shafiullah Soomro (4804227) (author), Kwang Nam Choi (4804230) (author)
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Cell Biology
Genetics
Developmental Biology
Space Science
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified
Information Systems not elsewhere classified
printed circuit boards
mean average precision
global feature extraction
enhance feature representation
xlink "> defects
inspired attention mechanism
combines vision transformers
imbalanced defect distributions
precise defect segmentation
vision transformer
pcb defects
attention fusion
accurate segmentation
limited generalization
improve robustness
hybrid framework
deep learning
consumer electronics
based techniques
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
  • Holdings
  • Description
  • Comments
  • Similar Items
  • Staff View

Similar Items

  • Artificial defect creation pipeline: A defect-free PCB undergoes mathematically defined defect generation and random transformations to produce defected samples.
    by: Asim Niaz (17655568)
    Published: (2025)
  • Examples from the PCB defect dataset, showcasing one image per defect category with annotated bounding boxes: missing hole, mouse bite, open circuit, short, spur, and spurious copper.
    by: Asim Niaz (17655568)
    Published: (2025)
  • Performance comparison of top methods across defect types.
    by: Asim Niaz (17655568)
    Published: (2025)
  • Illustration of various masks generated using the artificial defects creation module.
    by: Asim Niaz (17655568)
    Published: (2025)
  • Performance comparison from ablation experiments. Each component is removed or replaced to assess its contribution to the model. Results are reported as mean Average Precision (mAP).
    by: Asim Niaz (17655568)
    Published: (2025)

Find More

  • Browse the Catalog
  • Browse Alphabetically
  • Explore Channels
  • Course Reserves
  • New Items
Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ph69um5oetbuo9g1mae2tjc7gb