Illustration of trial procedure for the second experiment.

<p>The cue shown is an arrow, but in Experiment 1 the cue was a face with eyes pointing to either the left or the right. The face is not shown here for copyright reasons. Target gratings had a contrast of 50%, plus a 10% increment in either the upper or lower half. Note that images are not dra...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Cameron Smith (244750) (author)
Other Authors:	Daniel H. Baker (11559693) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Neuroscience Ecology Science Policy Mental Health Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified suggests interventions aiming repetitive stereotypies ), many individuals claim stimming specifically within stimming &# 8217 reduce stimming behaviours individual &# 8217 stimming benefits attention stimming behaviours &# 8216 spatial attention potential benefits neurotypical individuals autistic stimming fidgeting behaviours xlink "> widely reported typically engage task performance significant overlaps repetitive movements problematic behaviour potential overlap neurotypical participants neural correlates negative impact necessarily warranted help understand first validated eeg data data primarily cue onset cue direction chance classification autistic population also present also known
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Illustration of trial procedure for the second experiment.

Similar Items