Pearson correlations between predictors, per modality condition.

<p>The left, middle, and right panel shows the V (visual only), A (auditory only), and AV (audiovisual) condition, respectively.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Patricia R. DeLucia (5578274) (author)
Other Authors:	Daniel Oberfeld (296885) (author), Joseph K. Kearney (22783543) (author), Melissa Cloutier (22783546) (author), Anna M. Jilla (10769626) (author), Avery Zhou (22783549) (author), Stephanie Trejo Corona (22783552) (author), Jessica Cormier (22783555) (author), Audrey Taylor (1700128) (author), Charles C. Wykoff (8550325) (author), Robin Baurès (22783558) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Neuroscience Physiology Biotechnology Sociology Science Policy Mental Health xlink "> little standardized regression coefficients related macular degeneration mean absolute error vehicle would reach optical size compared approaching vehicle viewed visual impairment rely bilateral visual impairment different sensory sources impaired vision group people without iv iv group compared collision judgments made normal vision group different sources iv group vision group nv group different amounts visual cues normal vision similar performance showed differences severity suggested relative importance presented visually participants pressed nv ). multimodal advantage much importance modality conditions modality condition intraindividual variability hearing instead av condition
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items