RNR and WG Cq distribution for psyllid field samples, separated by nymphal stage.

<p>Enough nymph samples containing five nymphs per tube were collected to allow comparison between the distribution of RNR and WG Cq values versus nymph stage at collection. RNR: stages 1 and 2 n = 59, stage 3 n = 28, and stages 4 and 5 n = 32. WG: stages 1 and 2 n = 345, stage 3 n = 247, and...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Nathaniel Ponvert (17184784) (author)
Other Authors:	Frank Byrne (21354976) (author), Monique J. Rivera (17204545) (author), Timo Rohula (21354979) (author), Sandra Olkowski (2137909) (author), Heshani De Silva Weligodage (21354982) (author), Neil McRoberts (4716426) (author), Judith K. Brown (11722838) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Microbiology Biotechnology Ecology Sociology Plant Biology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified vector diseases affecting time quantitative pcr ten per tube psyllid developmental stage droplet digital pcr california using real 4 – 5 liberibacter asiaticus ’ genome load peaking div >< p asian citrus psyllid diaphorina citri </ california citrus groves adult acp might adult acp age citrus greening disease las detection correlated consistent qpcr detection citrus groves adult acp grove ’ genome copies citrus trees citrus industry >< b candidatus </ c </ acp adults temporal detection reliable detection las detection early detection detection rates uneven distribution symptomatic phase stable throughout sample size results indicated qpcr amplification potentially misrepresenting optimized scouting optimize approaches optimal number long pre las throughout las status infected trees field populations dna isolation destructive bacterial
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

RNR and WG Cq distribution for psyllid field samples, separated by nymphal stage.

Similar Items