Perceived distance as a function of auditory or vibrotactile frequencies, example raw data responses from different participants.

<p>(a) Experiment 1a, three patterns: negative, positive, and neutral. (b) Experiment 1b, three patterns: negative, positive, and neutral. (c) Experiment 2a, two patterns: negative, and neutral. (d) Experiment 2b, three patterns: negative, positive and neutral.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Pingping Jiang (307787) (author)
Other Authors:	Jonathan Rossiter (5915777) (author), Christopher Kent (454183) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Ecology Science Policy Mental Health Space Science Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified yet often overlook xlink "> vision shorter distances ), reveal common patterns potentially preventing users establishing mapping functions 99 hz ). receiving information intuitively modal matching experiments integrating underlying cross consistently positive correlation sensory substitution devices augmentation </ p tactile frequency mapping visual distance perception vibrotactile frequency within monotonic negative correlation auditory frequency within sensory substitution modal mapping visual distance visual information bidirectional mapping 2764 hz vibrotactile frequency reverse cross psychological cross modal mechanisms auditory frequency accurate information visual impairment two studies step forward range 47 previous investigations prevailing trend participants demonstrated natural human inherent relationship higher frequencies enhance intuitive different modalities daily tasks 59 %)
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Perceived distance as a function of auditory or vibrotactile frequencies, example raw data responses from different participants.

Similar Items