Framework for the acceptability of technological health innovations [25].

Framework for the acceptability of technological health innovations [25].

<p>Framework for the acceptability of technological health innovations [<a href="/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005119#pgph.0005119.ref025" target="_blank">25</a>].</p>

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile nagusia: Wezzie S. Lora (18139765) (author)
Beste egile batzuk: Yasmin Dunkley (20323888) (author), Itai Kabonga (20910260) (author), Elvis Isere (11349284) (author), MackWellings Phiri (22676615) (author), Chimwemwe Kwanjo Banda (22676618) (author), Euphemia Sibanda (4515067) (author), John Bimba (17445769) (author), Richard Chilongosi (7402244) (author), Karin Hatzold (291444) (author), Frances M. Cowan (10023557) (author), Elizabeth L. Corbett (8150859) (author), Augustine T. Choko (9951311) (author), Nicola Desmond (32737) (author)
Argitaratua: 2025
Gaiak:
Medicine
Sociology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
virus &# 8217
sample collection compared
rapid response capabilities
prolonged turnaround times
participants particularly valued
mitigate severe outcomes
louart &# 8217
face implementation challenges
different use cases
technological healthcare innovations
existing healthcare systems
three settings due
acceptable complementary methodology
xlink "> accessible
timely diagnostic testing
longer perceived testing
accessible diagnostic technologies
qualitative study drawing
healthcare workers
constrained settings
acceptable across
testing option
pcr testing
19 testing
rdt testing
theoretical framework
study revealed
strategic investment
somewhat affected
reduced stigma
participant groups
minimal disruption
many individuals
findings emphasise
depth interviews
delivery models
cost alternatives
community members
administered either
19 pandemic
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!

Antzeko izenburuak