SHAP values VS F and Γ feature value.

<p>We plot the trends of SHAP values for the Fitness (<i>F</i>) and Coherence (Γ) features against their respective values across three geographical scales. Each bar in the three couples of figures represents a decile of the dataset, ensuring an equal number of samples per bin. Val...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Matteo Straccamore (15083799) (author)
Other Authors:	Matteo Bruno (10008743) (author), Andrea Tacchella (302213) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Ecology Science Policy Plant Biology Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified xlink "> debates use patent data long intrigued scholars generate sophisticated technologies developing tailored strategies increased economic growth impact turns negative technological fitness shows technological fitness assesses diversification reduces vulnerability metropolitan area level technological coherence quantifies technological fitness negative influence metropolitan areas economic complexity technological coherence technological advancement regional level national level shaped relationship results indicate positive effect larger scales findings underscore different scales core strengths complex interplay comparative analysis
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

SHAP values VS F and Γ feature value.

Similar Items