Network graph of treatment comparison.

<p>Nodes represent competing treatments. A, Sorafenib; B, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab; C, atezolizumab plus cabozantinib.</p> <p>(TIF)</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Heng Xiang (679982) (author)
Other Authors:	Zhihua She (20756365) (author), Liting Wang (717544) (author), Ye Peng (320691) (author), Lei Zhang (38117) (author), Chongqing Tan (387068) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Medicine Genetics Pharmacology Biotechnology Evolutionary Biology Science Policy Infectious Diseases Virology Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified probabilistic sensitivity analyses atezolizumab plus aevacizumab atezolizumab plus aabozantinib advanced hepatocellular carcinoma 054 per qaly 000 per qaly included 761 patients included 487 patients probabilistic sensitivity analysis xlink "> findings xlink "> assessing advanced hcc patients assessed via one effectiveness analysis suggested xlink "> compared network treatment comparison 528 life years xlink "> patients regarding effectiveness analysis hcc ). wtp threshold two strategies sensitive factors pay threshold optimal choice november 2020 hazard ratios granted approval either bevacizumab effectiveness ratios effectiveness probabilities becomes imperative adjusted life 365 qalys
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items