_version_ 1852014279102824448
author Heng Xiang (679982)
author2 Zhihua She (20756365)
Liting Wang (717544)
Ye Peng (320691)
Lei Zhang (38117)
Chongqing Tan (387068)
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Heng Xiang (679982)
Zhihua She (20756365)
Liting Wang (717544)
Ye Peng (320691)
Lei Zhang (38117)
Chongqing Tan (387068)
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Heng Xiang (679982)
Zhihua She (20756365)
Liting Wang (717544)
Ye Peng (320691)
Lei Zhang (38117)
Chongqing Tan (387068)
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-03T18:30:53Z
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0337606.s002
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Network_graph_of_treatment_comparison_/30778776
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv CC BY 4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Medicine
Genetics
Pharmacology
Biotechnology
Evolutionary Biology
Science Policy
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
probabilistic sensitivity analyses
atezolizumab plus aevacizumab
atezolizumab plus aabozantinib
advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
054 per qaly
000 per qaly
included 761 patients
included 487 patients
probabilistic sensitivity analysis
xlink "> findings
xlink "> assessing
advanced hcc patients
assessed via one
effectiveness analysis suggested
xlink "> compared
network treatment comparison
528 life years
xlink ">
patients regarding
effectiveness analysis
hcc ).
wtp threshold
two strategies
sensitive factors
pay threshold
optimal choice
november 2020
hazard ratios
granted approval
either bevacizumab
effectiveness ratios
effectiveness probabilities
becomes imperative
adjusted life
365 qalys
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Network graph of treatment comparison.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Image
Figure
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
image
description <p>Nodes represent competing treatments. A, Sorafenib; B, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab; C, atezolizumab plus cabozantinib.</p> <p>(TIF)</p>
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
id Manara_cdac03797febdffd83ba3db542a5dde6
identifier_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0337606.s002
network_acronym_str Manara
network_name_str ManaraRepo
oai_identifier_str oai:figshare.com:article/30778776
publishDate 2025
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY 4.0
spelling Network graph of treatment comparison.Heng Xiang (679982)Zhihua She (20756365)Liting Wang (717544)Ye Peng (320691)Lei Zhang (38117)Chongqing Tan (387068)MedicineGeneticsPharmacologyBiotechnologyEvolutionary BiologyScience PolicyInfectious DiseasesVirologyBiological Sciences not elsewhere classifiedprobabilistic sensitivity analysesatezolizumab plus aevacizumabatezolizumab plus aabozantinibadvanced hepatocellular carcinoma054 per qaly000 per qalyincluded 761 patientsincluded 487 patientsprobabilistic sensitivity analysisxlink "> findingsxlink "> assessingadvanced hcc patientsassessed via oneeffectiveness analysis suggestedxlink "> comparednetwork treatment comparison528 life yearsxlink ">patients regardingeffectiveness analysishcc ).wtp thresholdtwo strategiessensitive factorspay thresholdoptimal choicenovember 2020hazard ratiosgranted approvaleither bevacizumabeffectiveness ratioseffectiveness probabilitiesbecomes imperativeadjusted life365 qalys<p>Nodes represent competing treatments. A, Sorafenib; B, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab; C, atezolizumab plus cabozantinib.</p> <p>(TIF)</p>2025-12-03T18:30:53ZImageFigureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionimage10.1371/journal.pone.0337606.s002https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Network_graph_of_treatment_comparison_/30778776CC BY 4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:figshare.com:article/307787762025-12-03T18:30:53Z
spellingShingle Network graph of treatment comparison.
Heng Xiang (679982)
Medicine
Genetics
Pharmacology
Biotechnology
Evolutionary Biology
Science Policy
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
probabilistic sensitivity analyses
atezolizumab plus aevacizumab
atezolizumab plus aabozantinib
advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
054 per qaly
000 per qaly
included 761 patients
included 487 patients
probabilistic sensitivity analysis
xlink "> findings
xlink "> assessing
advanced hcc patients
assessed via one
effectiveness analysis suggested
xlink "> compared
network treatment comparison
528 life years
xlink ">
patients regarding
effectiveness analysis
hcc ).
wtp threshold
two strategies
sensitive factors
pay threshold
optimal choice
november 2020
hazard ratios
granted approval
either bevacizumab
effectiveness ratios
effectiveness probabilities
becomes imperative
adjusted life
365 qalys
status_str publishedVersion
title Network graph of treatment comparison.
title_full Network graph of treatment comparison.
title_fullStr Network graph of treatment comparison.
title_full_unstemmed Network graph of treatment comparison.
title_short Network graph of treatment comparison.
title_sort Network graph of treatment comparison.
topic Medicine
Genetics
Pharmacology
Biotechnology
Evolutionary Biology
Science Policy
Infectious Diseases
Virology
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
probabilistic sensitivity analyses
atezolizumab plus aevacizumab
atezolizumab plus aabozantinib
advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
054 per qaly
000 per qaly
included 761 patients
included 487 patients
probabilistic sensitivity analysis
xlink "> findings
xlink "> assessing
advanced hcc patients
assessed via one
effectiveness analysis suggested
xlink "> compared
network treatment comparison
528 life years
xlink ">
patients regarding
effectiveness analysis
hcc ).
wtp threshold
two strategies
sensitive factors
pay threshold
optimal choice
november 2020
hazard ratios
granted approval
either bevacizumab
effectiveness ratios
effectiveness probabilities
becomes imperative
adjusted life
365 qalys