Species distances.

Species distances.

<p>The range of species distances varied from one genus to the next, suggesting that there is no universal species delimitation. Though results are very similar for all measures, dashing seemed to produce more outliers.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Julie E. Hernández-Salmerón (9562999) (author)
Other Authors:	Tanya Irani (16985548) (author), Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb (578) (author)
Published:	2023
Subjects:	Microbiology Evolutionary Biology Ecology Infectious Diseases Virology Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified receiver operating characteristic average nucleotide identity analysis found area 68 ), followed 25 apparent phylogroups efficient bacterial identification still highly accurate species distance ranges div >< p represented species reduced bacterial species delimitation estimates might suffice lowest auc values similarity estimates based species delimitation based delimitation bacterial taxonomy three species species represented genus ranges genomic similarity based detection fast estimates yersinia </ widely used variable correlation three measures take orders standard measure short nucleotides shigella </ road assessment results suggest providencia </ proteus </ potential contaminants pectobacterium </ magnitude longer klebsiella </ increase confidence genome similarity focused tests escherichia </ enterobacter </ dickeya </ coli </ citrobacter </ called sketches auc values 80 ).
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!