Experiment 1. (a) Participants listened to frequency-modulated (FM) auditory stimuli with varying modulation depths and were tasked with identifying silent gaps within stimuli. (b) Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was administered bilaterally targeting the auditory cortices using a multichannel system.

<p>Concurrently, tACS-induced electrical signals were recorded via EEG for subsequent post hoc phase-lag analysis. The bottom brain maps depict the average estimated electric field distribution (E-field) of our stimulation montage across a cohort of 39 independent subjects (modified from [<...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Yuranny Cabral-Calderin (21492072) (author)
Other Authors:	Molly J. Henry (8039789) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Neuroscience Science Policy Mental Health Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified unmodulated noise stimuli targeting individual frequencies tacs effects would tacs effects depend auditory stimuli predominated div >< p sensory stimuli prevail sensory stimuli dominate auditory stimulus frequency although tacs effects rhythmic auditory stimuli rhythmic electrical stimulation auditory stimulus sensory stimuli electrical stimuli sensory stimulation preferred frequency individual ’ auditory signals auditory rhythms auditory rhythm tacs experiments rhythmic sounds rhythmic information primarily modulatory previously demonstrated presented together oscillator model observed behaviorally n </ modulation depth free parameter findings suggest experiment 3 experiment 2 experiment 1 entraining behavior electrical rhythm 12 ).
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items