The kinematic comparison at 0.85m/s.

(a,b,e,f) compare the Desired trajectory and limit cycle with Passive, Active, and Natural conditions at hip and knee joints for a representative participant. (c,d,g,h) compare the correlation coefficient and RMS of deviations from the Desired and Natural trajectories with Active and Passiv...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Rezvan Nasiri (6042980) (author)
Other Authors:	Hannah Dinovitzer (20598114) (author), Nirosh Manohara (20598117) (author), Arash Arami (20598120) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Physiology Science Policy Space Science Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified virtual energy regulator convergence proof considering based path controller muscle effort reduction exoskeleton coordination remains resultant assisted gait optimal gait performance exoskeleton locomotion emerges exoskeleton desired trajectories ver revealed improvements resultant gait coordination nine healthy individuals div >< p demonstrated great potential generate coordinated locomotion residual motor ability intended limit cycle 9 %, 15 lower limb exoskeleton different speeds compared limit cycle intended trajectories different speeds coordinated locomotion torque exoskeleton coordination problem muscle activities motor impairments locomotion control limb exoskeletons gait rehabilitation ver ’ ver demonstrate ver )’ experimented ver 1 %, user ’ user engagement linear combination kinetic measures indicators suggest findings may coordinated human bodied individuals
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

The kinematic comparison at 0.85<i>m</i>/<i>s</i>.

Similar Items