Algorithm ranking based on results from both magnitude and shape cohorts.

<p>(A-B) and (C-D) show the average rank and Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), respectively, for all 30 algorithms across all cohorts. Average ranks were obtained by comparing all algorithm using Nemenyi tests in the R package <i>mlr3benchmark</i>, and lower average ranks indicate better...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Arshiya Mariam (10190281) (author)
Other Authors:	Hamed Javidi (19852442) (author), Emily C. Zabor (2831951) (author), Ran Zhao (337603) (author), Tomas Radivoyevitch (5431) (author), Daniel M. Rotroff (1329336) (author)
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Biochemistry Medicine Biotechnology Space Science Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified Information Systems not elsewhere classified sequence alignment tasks dynamic time warping derive meaningful insights consistently high bmi adjusted rand index applied 30 state shown immense promise robust algorithms tested longitudinal clinical measurements div >< p 93 – 6 highest accuracies across missingness impacted accuracies clinical measurements highest ari similar accuracies world settings unsupervised clustering trajectory shapes timeseries compiled systematic evaluation signal processing regular timeseries prior literature nemenyi tests median ari magnitude compared identify patterns greatest risk gaining insight fourteen partitional ci </ bound variants blood pressure ari ). algorithm identified accuracy using >: 3 70 ). 426 ). 30 methods 12 ).
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Algorithm ranking based on results from both magnitude and shape cohorts.

Similar Items