uOT compared to .

uOT compared to .

<p>Box plots of the –score’s complement (left panel) and the unbalanced optimal transport distance (right panel). The distances were computed on all 33 pieces in the WoO 80 set. A distribution of distances comparing grouped study conditions (aural/visual) are shown on each row.</p>

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Bedoya (13139364) (author)
Other Authors: Paul Lascabettes (18246492) (author), Lawrence Fyfe (13139367) (author), Elaine Chew (8288319) (author)
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Biochemistry
Neuroscience
Space Science
Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
variable strengths given
tracks boundary weights
reliable algorithmic analysis
penalizes boundary removal
less well understood
hearing based activities
differing audiovisual conditions
complex structural nuances
boundary credence profiles
beethoven &# 8217
33 contrasting theme
support data analysis
music information retrieval
visuals provide cues
visual annotation tasks
high quality annotations
based citizen science
performed music structures
aural input combined
contribute data
big structures
aural inputs
recorded music
music therapy
music media
woo 80
visuals led
visual representations
visual inputs
variations extracted
segmentation boundaries
scientific projects
recorded performance
piano roll
larger peaks
gold standard
enhance results
cognitive scaffolding
c minor
better discerned
applications ranging
32 variations
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items