Comparative effectiveness of CO@h–admissions.

<div><p>Introduction</p><p>The pandemic saw widespread use of home pulse oximeters to patients diagnosed with COVID-19 to support early detection of low oxygen saturation levels and appropriate care. Rapid implementation made conventional evaluation challenging, highlighting...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Fernando Rubinstein (6650612) (author)
Other Authors:	Richard Williams (29445) (author), Jo Dumville (3532469) (author), Binita Kane (16298282) (author), William Whittaker (3104667) (author), Peter Bower (52501) (author), Evangelos Kontopantelis (437866) (author)
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Cancer Science Policy Infectious Diseases Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified informed written consent formal ethical approval 54 &# 8211 44 &# 8211 32 &# 8211 3 &# 8211 randomised evaluation using home &# 8217 protocol gmcr rq adjusted odds ratios 25 &# 8211 home pulse oximeters used routine data 1 year later support early detection xlink "> use xlink "> early detection &# 8216 used data randomised methods pulse oximetry overall odds adjusted ors 1 year support management support decision patient use future use effective use unplanned hospitalisation unplanned admissions understand whether service improvement resulting prioritisation primary outcomes patients diagnosed likely effective identified format higher frequency greater manchester data extraction clinical deterioration ci 1 appropriate care 90 days 28 days
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Comparative effectiveness of CO@h–admissions.

Similar Items