Curriculum Innovation for Equity and Excellence: An Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges in Singapore’s Gifted Education Policy Experience
This study analyses the innovation in the evolution of Singapore’s 40-year-old Gifted Education Programme (GEP) launched in 1984, and its shift to another innovative Higher-Ability Learners (HAL) framework, launched in 2024. The aim of this paper is to assess to understand the curriculum and policy...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| منشور في: |
2025
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/3393 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
| الملخص: | This study analyses the innovation in the evolution of Singapore’s 40-year-old Gifted Education Programme (GEP) launched in 1984, and its shift to another innovative Higher-Ability Learners (HAL) framework, launched in 2024. The aim of this paper is to assess to understand the curriculum and policy experience of Singapore in its 40-year experience in gifted education and the potential benefits of the experience for global cities like Dubai who seek to balance excellence and equity in gifted education. Through a qualitative documentary analysis of the shift in the curriculum design, this paper traces the historical evolution of this transition, using curriculum innovation theories which includes Tyler’s rational-linear model, Stenhouse’s process model, and Tomlinson’s differentiation theory- as an analytical lens. Outcome of analyses indicate that the move from a centralized, top 1% model (GEP) to a decentralized, top 10% model (HAL) aims to broaden access but introduces significant risks, including the dilution of academic rigor, systemic gaps in teacher readiness for differentiation, gift and talent identification criteria, and the potential for Singapore’s competitive “kiasu” culture to undermine reform goals. The analysis concludes that while HAL represents a necessary and ambitious step towards democratizing the design of the gifted education curriculum, its success is dependent upon overcoming profound pedagogical, structural, and cultural barriers. This analysis offers critical implications for policymakers across different contexts. The primary limitation, however, is the current absence of longitudinal empirical evidence to assess HAL's long-term efficacy due to its recent implementation, which clearly establishes a vital scope for future research. |
|---|