Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique

ObjectiveRecognizing the importance of training graduate students in scientific critique and peer review, we introduced an innovative instructional strategy using the transparent peer review policy (TPRP). This study aimed to explore students’ feedback and reflection on how published peer review rep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Raed, Ababneh (author)
Other Authors: Rachid, Ousama (author), Awaisu, Ahmed (author), Alkilany, Alaaldin M. (author)
Format: article
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101268
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924109874
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/60692
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1857415087618260992
author Raed, Ababneh
author2 Rachid, Ousama
Awaisu, Ahmed
Alkilany, Alaaldin M.
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet Raed, Ababneh
Rachid, Ousama
Awaisu, Ahmed
Alkilany, Alaaldin M.
author_role author
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Raed, Ababneh
Rachid, Ousama
Awaisu, Ahmed
Alkilany, Alaaldin M.
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-29T09:04:13Z
2024-10-31
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101268
Ababneh, R., Rachid, O., Awaisu, A., & Alkilany, A. M. (2024). Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 88(10), 101268.‏
00029459
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924109874
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/60692
10
88
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Transparent peer review policy
Scientific critique skills
Qualitative content analysis
Educational pedagogy
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
description ObjectiveRecognizing the importance of training graduate students in scientific critique and peer review, we introduced an innovative instructional strategy using the transparent peer review policy (TPRP). This study aimed to explore students’ feedback and reflection on how published peer review reports influenced their scientific critique skills and thought process. MethodsWe used TPRP-adopting journals’ publicly available peer review reports for Master of Science in Pharmacy students, who analyzed real cases, including author submissions, reviewer comments, author rebuttals, editorial decisions, and final publications. A reflection assignment required students to share their insights on the TPRP-adopting journals’ review processes and how these influenced their scientific reviewing skills. Qualitative content analysis of the submitted reflections was conducted by two instructors not involved in developing or delivering this aspect of the course. ResultsEleven students submitted reflections on their learning experiences through this public-facing peer review process. The analysis revealed that TPRP increased the students’ awareness of the peer review process and fundamental principles of scientific critique. Five key themes emerged: understanding research content, inspiring ideas, fostering objectivity, enriching peer review comprehension, and evaluating transparent peer review pros and cons. Students showed a positive attitude toward this pedagogical approach for acquiring the targeted skills. ConclusionWe utilized peer review reports from TPRP-supporting journals as an educational tool, providing training on the fundamentals of peer review and scientific critique. This study suggests recommending TPRP-supported journal reports as a valuable educational tool for teaching scientific critique and peer review skills among graduate students.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id qu_14e54fe2dab0ab73c7e626fcf3eea4b0
identifier_str_mv Ababneh, R., Rachid, O., Awaisu, A., & Alkilany, A. M. (2024). Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 88(10), 101268.‏
00029459
10
88
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str qu
network_name_str Qatar University repository
oai_identifier_str oai:qspace.qu.edu.qa:10576/60692
publishDate 2024
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spelling Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific CritiqueRaed, AbabnehRachid, OusamaAwaisu, AhmedAlkilany, Alaaldin M.Transparent peer review policyScientific critique skillsQualitative content analysisEducational pedagogyObjectiveRecognizing the importance of training graduate students in scientific critique and peer review, we introduced an innovative instructional strategy using the transparent peer review policy (TPRP). This study aimed to explore students’ feedback and reflection on how published peer review reports influenced their scientific critique skills and thought process. MethodsWe used TPRP-adopting journals’ publicly available peer review reports for Master of Science in Pharmacy students, who analyzed real cases, including author submissions, reviewer comments, author rebuttals, editorial decisions, and final publications. A reflection assignment required students to share their insights on the TPRP-adopting journals’ review processes and how these influenced their scientific reviewing skills. Qualitative content analysis of the submitted reflections was conducted by two instructors not involved in developing or delivering this aspect of the course. ResultsEleven students submitted reflections on their learning experiences through this public-facing peer review process. The analysis revealed that TPRP increased the students’ awareness of the peer review process and fundamental principles of scientific critique. Five key themes emerged: understanding research content, inspiring ideas, fostering objectivity, enriching peer review comprehension, and evaluating transparent peer review pros and cons. Students showed a positive attitude toward this pedagogical approach for acquiring the targeted skills. ConclusionWe utilized peer review reports from TPRP-supporting journals as an educational tool, providing training on the fundamentals of peer review and scientific critique. This study suggests recommending TPRP-supported journal reports as a valuable educational tool for teaching scientific critique and peer review skills among graduate students.Elsevier2024-10-29T09:04:13Z2024-10-31Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101268Ababneh, R., Rachid, O., Awaisu, A., & Alkilany, A. M. (2024). Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 88(10), 101268.‏00029459https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924109874http://hdl.handle.net/10576/606921088enhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:qspace.qu.edu.qa:10576/606922024-10-29T19:06:43Z
spellingShingle Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique
Raed, Ababneh
Transparent peer review policy
Scientific critique skills
Qualitative content analysis
Educational pedagogy
status_str publishedVersion
title Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique
title_full Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique
title_fullStr Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique
title_short Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique
title_sort Utilization of the Transparent Peer Review Policy to Train Graduate Pharmacy Students on Scientific Critique
topic Transparent peer review policy
Scientific critique skills
Qualitative content analysis
Educational pedagogy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101268
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924109874
http://hdl.handle.net/10576/60692