Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels during entire stimulus presentation or late phase V1 activity impairs discrimination performance, whereas stimulating during early phase V1 activity improves performance.
<p><b>A)</b> Example of grating stimuli separated by 90° for easy task (top), schematic of optogenetic manipulations activating only PV cells expressing ChR2 (middle), optogenetic stimulation timings for all four conditions aligned to stimulus onset (STIM ON) or offset (STIM OFF) (...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | Lilia Kukovska (22683586) (author) |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | Katharina A. Wilmes (22683589) (author), Natsumi Y. Homma (22683592) (author), Claudia Clopath (324706) (author), Jasper Poort (22683595) (author) |
| منشور في: |
2025
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels does not improve performance of difficult visual discriminations.
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025) -
PV cell activation alone does not induce changes in behavioral redouts during the stimulation period (0–2 s).
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025) -
Changes in neural selectivity caused by PV cell activation reflect behavioral performance in easy but not difficult discriminations.
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025) -
(related to Fig 5) Effects of PV cell activation on the activity of Pyr cells across the different time windows and task difficulty conditions.
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025) -
Increased selectivity requires competition and nonlinear activation function in pyramidal cells.
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025)