Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels during entire stimulus presentation or late phase V1 activity impairs discrimination performance, whereas stimulating during early phase V1 activity improves performance.
<p><b>A)</b> Example of grating stimuli separated by 90° for easy task (top), schematic of optogenetic manipulations activating only PV cells expressing ChR2 (middle), optogenetic stimulation timings for all four conditions aligned to stimulus onset (STIM ON) or offset (STIM OFF) (...
שמור ב:
| מחבר ראשי: | Lilia Kukovska (22683586) (author) |
|---|---|
| מחברים אחרים: | Katharina A. Wilmes (22683589) (author), Natsumi Y. Homma (22683592) (author), Claudia Clopath (324706) (author), Jasper Poort (22683595) (author) |
| יצא לאור: |
2025
|
| נושאים: | |
| תגים: |
הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
|
פריטים דומים
-
Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels does not improve performance of difficult visual discriminations.
מאת: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
יצא לאור: (2025) -
PV cell activation alone does not induce changes in behavioral redouts during the stimulation period (0–2 s).
מאת: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
יצא לאור: (2025) -
Changes in neural selectivity caused by PV cell activation reflect behavioral performance in easy but not difficult discriminations.
מאת: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
יצא לאור: (2025) -
(related to Fig 5) Effects of PV cell activation on the activity of Pyr cells across the different time windows and task difficulty conditions.
מאת: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
יצא לאור: (2025) -
Increased selectivity requires competition and nonlinear activation function in pyramidal cells.
מאת: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
יצא לאור: (2025)