Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels during entire stimulus presentation or late phase V1 activity impairs discrimination performance, whereas stimulating during early phase V1 activity improves performance.
<p><b>A)</b> Example of grating stimuli separated by 90° for easy task (top), schematic of optogenetic manipulations activating only PV cells expressing ChR2 (middle), optogenetic stimulation timings for all four conditions aligned to stimulus onset (STIM ON) or offset (STIM OFF) (...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | Lilia Kukovska (22683586) (author) |
|---|---|
| Другие авторы: | Katharina A. Wilmes (22683589) (author), Natsumi Y. Homma (22683592) (author), Claudia Clopath (324706) (author), Jasper Poort (22683595) (author) |
| Опубликовано: |
2025
|
| Предметы: | |
| Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
Схожие документы
-
Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels does not improve performance of difficult visual discriminations.
по: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубликовано: (2025) -
PV cell activation alone does not induce changes in behavioral redouts during the stimulation period (0–2 s).
по: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубликовано: (2025) -
Changes in neural selectivity caused by PV cell activation reflect behavioral performance in easy but not difficult discriminations.
по: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубликовано: (2025) -
(related to Fig 5) Effects of PV cell activation on the activity of Pyr cells across the different time windows and task difficulty conditions.
по: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубликовано: (2025) -
Increased selectivity requires competition and nonlinear activation function in pyramidal cells.
по: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубликовано: (2025)