Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels during entire stimulus presentation or late phase V1 activity impairs discrimination performance, whereas stimulating during early phase V1 activity improves performance.
<p><b>A)</b> Example of grating stimuli separated by 90° for easy task (top), schematic of optogenetic manipulations activating only PV cells expressing ChR2 (middle), optogenetic stimulation timings for all four conditions aligned to stimulus onset (STIM ON) or offset (STIM OFF) (...
Збережено в:
| Автор: | Lilia Kukovska (22683586) (author) |
|---|---|
| Інші автори: | Katharina A. Wilmes (22683589) (author), Natsumi Y. Homma (22683592) (author), Claudia Clopath (324706) (author), Jasper Poort (22683595) (author) |
| Опубліковано: |
2025
|
| Предмети: | |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Схожі ресурси
Схожі ресурси
-
Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels does not improve performance of difficult visual discriminations.
за авторством: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубліковано: (2025) -
PV cell activation alone does not induce changes in behavioral redouts during the stimulation period (0–2 s).
за авторством: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубліковано: (2025) -
Changes in neural selectivity caused by PV cell activation reflect behavioral performance in easy but not difficult discriminations.
за авторством: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубліковано: (2025) -
(related to Fig 5) Effects of PV cell activation on the activity of Pyr cells across the different time windows and task difficulty conditions.
за авторством: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубліковано: (2025) -
Increased selectivity requires competition and nonlinear activation function in pyramidal cells.
за авторством: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
Опубліковано: (2025)